Mats Bredschneijder vs Noah Merre Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L L L W L
Form
W W W L W L W W L LH2H: Bredschneijder 1 - 0 Merre
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bredschneijder winning 2 and Merre winning 0. The last match between Bredschneijder and Merre was at the M25 Brussels, 24-06-2024, Q3, Clay with Mats Bredschneijder getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mats Bredschneijder | 1 |
| Noah Merre | 0 |
M25 Brussels(24-06-2024)
6
4
6
1
| Bredschneijder | Stats | Merre |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 20 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 50% (19-19) | Career Total W/L | 52% (17-16) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bredschneijder VS Merre H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Mats Bredschneijder
Player
Noah Merre
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
8
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Bredschneijder VS Merre H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:30:0 | Average Match Time | 1:30:0 |
| 54% (42/78) | 1st Serve % | 56% (28/50) |
| 69% (29/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 42% (15/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (2/10) |
| 56% (28/50) | Return Points Win % | 44% (34/78) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mats Bredschneijder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Louis Herman
Player
Mats Bredschneijder
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
38%
(
25 of
66)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
12
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Bredschneijder
Player
Maikel De Boes
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 2-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Mats Bredschneijder
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Bredschneijder
Player
Harold Van Raemdonck
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Noah Merre Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Noah Merre
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre Antoine Tailleu
Player
Noah Merre
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Merre
Player
Tomi Van Den Ham
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
55)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Dedura-Palomero
Player
Noah Merre
65%
(
77 of
119)
1st Serve %
67%
(
85 of
126)
1
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
0
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
46%
(
55 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
59 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
122
|
7-6(2) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-2 10-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Merre
Player
Tim Gennes
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve %
48%
(
11 of
23)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
31
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (19/19) | Win/Loss | 52% (17/16) |
| 48% (41/45) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (42/35) |
| 49% (410/427) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (392/365) |
| 59% (10/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) |
| 42% (8/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (10/10) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 27 | Aces Total | 20 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 59 | Total Double Faults | 56 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 149.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 92 |
| 55% (656/1186) | 1st Serve % | 65% (712/1100) |
| 61% (397/656) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (422/712) |
| 44% (233/530) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (179/388) |
| 48% (55/114) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (51/109) |
| 43% (472/1094) | Return Points Win % | 42% (421/1011) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (19/19) | Futures W/L | 52% (17/16) |
| 50% (19/38) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (1/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 70% (7/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (3/12) |
| 86% (21/18) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (18/15) |
| 14% (21/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (18/3) |
| 6% (17/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (15/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
